Is “Normal” Monsoon a Decent Indicator of Good Agricultural Output?

केंद्र के कृषि कानूनों के खिलाफ पारित विधेयकों पर क्या कहते हैं किसान नेता

पंजाब की विधानसभा ने मंगलवार को केंद्र के कृषि कानूनों को राज्य में प्रभावहीन करने वाले तीन कृषि विधेयक को सर्वसम्मति से...

केंद्र के कृषि कानूनों के खिलाफ अमरिंदर सरकार के विधेयक पारित

केंद्र के कृषि कानूनों के खिलाफ पंजाब विधानसभा में 4 विधेयक पारित हो गए हैं। विधेयक पेश करते हुए सीएम अमरिंदर सिंह...

केंद्र के कानूनों के खिलाफ पंजाब में विधेयक पारित, सीएम अमरिंदर ने कहा- किसान हित में इस्तीफा देना भी मंजूर

केंद्र के कृषि कानूनों खिलाफ पंजाब की अमरिंदर सरकार ने एक बड़ा कदम उठाया है। मंगलवार को वह पंजाब विधानसभा से खेती...

महाराष्ट्र से पंजाब तक कपास की एमएसपी को तरसे किसान

केंद्र सरकार हर मौके पर कृषि कानूनों से किसानों को फायदे होने के दावे कर रही है। उसका यह भी कहना है...

कृषि क़ानून: कैसा रहा पंजाब विधान सभा का विशेष सत्र

कृषि कानूनों के खिलाफ पंजाब विधान सभा में विशेष सत्र के पहले दिन क्या- क्या हुआ? हरियाणा में किसान संगठनों ने खट्टर...

Recently, the India Meteorological Department (IMD) made the forecast that rainfall in June-September period is likely to be at 97 per cent of long period average (LPA). After the LPA average of 106 per cent in 2013, during the next four years, the figures for actual rainfall were 88, 86, 97, 95 per cent, respectively. In fact, the rainfall figure of 2013 happens to be among the best in almost two decades and also contributed to an impressive agricultural growth rate of 5.6 per cent followed by – 0.2, 0.6, 6.3, and 3 per cent, respectively.

In other words, a “normal” monsoon is supposed to be good news for Indian agriculture and rural economy. Further, in spite of its relatively small share (of approximately 14 per cent) in GDP, agriculture’s performance has, through multiple linkages, significant implications for the economy as a whole. Thus, a normal rainfall is generally greeted with much cheer by economic forecasters. Given that much of India’s agriculture is dependent on rainfall for irrigation, the above noted presumed connections made by the “commoners” as well as the “experts” are hardly surprising.

But, as per the latest economic survey (Economic Survey 2017-18), assured irrigation is still a luxury for large segments of agricultural tracts in the country. Of the total net sown area, estimated to be 141.4 million hectares, only 68.2 million hectares are irrigated and 73.2 million hectares are largely dependent on rainfall; in other words, the former accounts for close to 48 per cent of the net sown area in the country. Furthermore, the net irrigated area as a percentage of total cropped area is even lower at 34.5 per cent. Such figures clearly point to major policy inadequacies since independence and are reminiscent of the old saying that the Indian agriculture is a “gamble of monsoons”! However, it is important to go beyond the simplistic linkages between good and bountiful rains with respect to long period average** (LPA) and levels of average agricultural output. This note is an attempt to examine some of the relevant complexities. Of course, a rigorous academic exercise needs to take into accounts a whole range of factors that influence agriculture’s performance over different time horizons, namely, short, medium and long-run. Indeed, there is substantial academic research, which has sought to examine the role of important determinants (institutional e.g. land reform as well as technocratic interventions e.g. agri-investments, price policies etc.) of the outcomes in the agricultural sector. In this short piece, such an academic exercise is ruled out; basically, what follows is an attempt to go beyond the “common sense” wisdom.

As should be obvious, over the medium to long run several institutional and technocratic variables are likely to play critical roles and it is not easy to segregate their influence on agriculture’s performance. Hence, in this note, I look at a relatively short period of approximately the last decade taking into account the years for which the relevant data is easily available in the public domain. We look at the latest information on state-wise production of food grains, major cereals and a few other significant crops (provided in the Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy, the Reserve Bank of India) and the aggregate rainfall through the year, for the country as well as state-wise (given in the Statistical Year Book India 2017, MoSPI, Government of India). To make the data from the two sources comparable, we have made appropriate adjustments. In this note, “year” has been defined as April 1 to March 31. Given that we are looking at twelve months of rainfall instead of only the limited period of South-West Monsoon, the reported figures here, on an average, would be higher than LPA as well deficit or excess with respect to it. The findings reported here using the relevant data for the period 2007-08 to 2014-15 is based on a couple of very simple exercises.

The first of these examines the relationship between the total annual food grain production for the country as a whole and annual aggregate rainfall and the graph below depicts the same in a simple visual fashion; the relationship between the two variables appears to be positive and significant. However, if we look at the different crop groupings even at the all India level, substantial variations may be noted. For instance, the value of correlation coefficient for rice is as little as 0.17 whereas for oilseeds, the relevant value is 0.85!

Total Food grain and Aggregate Rainfall.

Values of Correlation Coefficient for Major Food Groupings and Aggregate Rainfall.

However, the Table below, which summarizes the value of correlation coefficients between rainfall and major crop groups, across states and regions for the period 2007-08 to 2014-15, immediately warns us against the simplistic conclusion noted earlier based on the first graph. As may be seen for several states and several crop groups, we get a whole spectrum of results, including inverse relationships, between them. For instance, in case of food grains and rice, four state/regions show an inverse relationship whereas in case of wheat there is only one incidence of such relationship. For other crops grouping, the incidence of inverse relationship turns out to be much higher (between 7 and 8). It seems almost bizarre that for Arunachal Pradesh, the values of correlation coefficients for all food groupings are in the negative whereas for Gujarat, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, the opposite is true. Even for major cereals the values cover an astonishingly large range; for rice the values happen to be between -0.269 (Kerala) and 0.868 (Chhattisgarh) whereas for wheat the range for the relevant values is between -0.179 (Arunachal Pradesh) and 0.786 (Gujarat).

Clearly, these point to a number of other possible factors at work in different parts of the country, even if we are looking at a period of less than a decade. We may also note that further statistical probing throws up additional challenges with respect to neat relationships between the agricultural produce and rainfall levels. In other words, the need for a careful investigation can hardly be overstated and there is a substantial academic literature which has tried to engage with the matter at hand. As stated earlier, it is not possible to get into the relevant issues in any detail for reasons of space.

However, a couple of simple points underscoring the nature of monsoons may be worth noting. The first of these is: a good monsoon must also be well distributed across different agro-climatic and geographical regions. Second, it is also equally important that there is good distribution of the aggregate rainfall (e.g. with respect to the number of precipitation, intensity of each precipitation, etc.) not only across the two major seasons (Kharif and Rabi) but it should be in keeping with the crop-cycle requirements. With respect to both these, the research has shown disturbing and undesirable developments and researchers have often linked these with climate change. There is growing evidence for extreme weather events (such as floods and droughts connected with on-going global warming, with significant implications for farming and farmers. Researchers have also noted that climate change appears to be contributing to new pests, crop diseases, etc., apart from growing incidence of so-called “natural calamities”. As was noted by the latest Economic Survey (2017-18), dramatic environmental changes in the recent years, often attributed to factors associated with climate change, underscore the significance of investing in “climate resilient agriculture”.

Values of Correlation Coefficient for Major Food Groupings and Aggregate Rainfall.

As noted right at the outset, given the overwhelming dependence for irrigation on the monsoons, obviously good rainfalls are important and will continue to remain so. However, we have to understand the inter-temporal changes in the nature of monsoons itself to have a better understanding of their impact on agricultural output. Equally importantly, even in the short-run here is a clutch of policy interventions (e.g. flow of credit, timely backward and forward support to agriculture through provisioning of inputs, marketing, etc.) that can and do impact on performance of agriculture.

(Data obtained from Handbook on India Economy, Reserve Bank of India; and the Statistical Year Book India (various years), Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation, Government of India.)
* Note: For 2017-18, the figure is as per the second advanced estimates
**Note: The current long period average is based on a period of 50 years (1951 to 2000) by average rainfall received during the South-West Monsoon for the country as a whole. Based on this calculation, the current LPA is taken to be 89 cm. In case, the deficit with respect to this figure is 10 per cent or more then it is considered deficit and if the rainfall is greater than 110 per cent of the LPA then it is considered to be excess rainfall. Rainfall within 96 to 104 per cent of the LPA is considered normal.

लोकप्रिय

कृषि विधेयकों के खिलाफ किसान आंदोलनों के बीच फसलों की एमएसपी में इजाफा

कृषि से जुड़े विधेयकों को लेकर किसान लगातार आंदोलन कर रहे हैं. विपक्ष संसद से पारित हो चुके इन विधेयकों को किसान...

कृषि कानूनों के खिलाफ 25 सितंबर को भारत बंद 

कृषि से जुड़े तीनों विधेयक भले ही संसद से पारित हो गए हों लेकिन किसानों ने इनके खिलाफ आंदोलनों को और तेज...

क्या एमएसपी के ताबूत में आखिरी कील साबित होंगे नए कृषि विधेयक

कोरोना संकट और लॉकडाउन के बीच मोदी सरकार ने जिस अफरा-तफरी में तीनों कृषि अध्यादेशों लाई, इन्हें विधेयक के रूप में संसद...

Related Articles

कॉन्ट्रैक्ट फार्मिंग से किसे फायदा?

कॉन्ट्रैक्ट फार्मिंग यानी ठेका खेती, मोदी सरकार ने हाल ही में मूल्य आश्वासन और कृषि सेवाओं पर किसान (सशक्तिकरण और संरक्षण) समझौते-2020...

क्यों फसल बीमा से किसान ही नहीं, राज्य सरकारें भी पीछा छुड़ा रही हैं?

किसानों को खेत में फ़सलों की बुआई से लेकर उसकी कटाई तक तमाम जोखिमों से सुरक्षा देने वाली मोदी सरकार की फ़्लैगशिप...

मंडियां नहीं बचेंगी तो क्या होगा?

राज्यों ने एग्रीकल्चर मार्केटिंग प्रोड्यूस कमेटी यानी एपीएमसी एक्ट के तहत मंडियों को बनाया जिनसे किसानों को बड़ी सहूलियतें मिली हैं। मंडियों...